{"id":11294,"date":"2016-06-16T18:39:11","date_gmt":"2016-06-16T18:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/?p=11294"},"modified":"2017-09-21T10:35:35","modified_gmt":"2017-09-21T10:35:35","slug":"brilliant-new-book-presents-the-case-against-legalization","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2016\/06\/brilliant-new-book-presents-the-case-against-legalization\/","title":{"rendered":"Brilliant New Book Presents the Case Against Legalization"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2016\/06\/brilliant-new-book-presents-the-case-against-legalization\/marijuana-debunked-3\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-13475\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-13475 alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Marijuana-Debunked-198x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"198\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Marijuana-Debunked-198x300.jpg 198w, https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/Marijuana-Debunked.jpg 452w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 198px) 100vw, 198px\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">There are at least two sides to every debate, but in the case of marijuana legalization, only proponents\u2019 side is being heard. That changes with the\u00a0publication this month of <em>Marijuana Debunked.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">One of the favorite claims of marijuana-legalization proponents (and biased journalists, see next story) is that marijuana cures cancer. Like most other claims for the drug\u2019s ability to cure or relieve some 250 different diseases, this one originates from 1) a lack of understanding about how science works and 2) plain, old-fashioned greed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Ed Gogek, MD, is an addiction psychiatrist who has treated more than 10,000 addicts over his 30-year practice. Like all doctors, he has been trained to evaluate evidence that leads to FDA drug approval as well as insufficient evidence that fails to support such medical claims.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">In <em>Marijuana Debunked<\/em>, Dr. Gogek exposes medical marijuana for what it is: the camel\u2019s nose under the recreational marijuana tent. The four states and the District of Columbia that have legalized recreational pot got there by first legalizing medical pot. And medical pot provided the opening for a commercial industry to develop that already rivals the tobacco and alcohol industries in targeting children and the addicted as lifetime consumers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Dr. Gogek analyzes the substantial research that shows how marijuana hurts people, especially children. He calls out the media for biased reporting about the drug and the entertainment industry for promoting it\u2019s use. He asks us to rethink marijauna policy to find a \u201cthird way\u201d between prohibition and legalization and describes what that might look like.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">In short, Dr. Gogek has made a powerful, passionate case against legalization and its inevitable consequences. He shows that we have a choice: we can base marijuana policy on science and find an alternative to current policy or we can succumb to the siren call of free-market profits and increased tax revenues (that won\u2019t cover costs) and legalize a third addictive drug. Everyone concerned about health, justice, and the ability of our citizens to thrive should read his book.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2016\/06\/brilliant-new-book-presents-the-case-against-legalization\/national-cancer-institute\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-13476\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-13476 size-medium alignright\" src=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/National-Cancer-Institute-300x296.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"296\" srcset=\"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/National-Cancer-Institute-300x296.png 300w, https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/National-Cancer-Institute.png 453w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\"><strong>Did the National Cancer Institute<\/strong><strong> \u201cFinally Admit that Marijuana Cures Cancer\u201d?<\/strong><\/span><br \/>\n<span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\"> When a news story begins like this\u2014\u201cFor the medical industrial complex, there is nothing as terrifying as a cure, or remedy, for a highly profitable and fatal disease like cancer\u201d\u2014you know you are in for a biased read.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Politicususa.com published a story Sunday that asserts the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is now \u201cadvising that cannabinoids are useful in treating cancer and its side effects by smoking, eating it in a baked product, drinking herbal teas, or even spraying it under the tongue.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Deconstructing this quotation word-for-word reveals it is actually a combination of phrases from different questions in Cannabis and Cannabinoids (PDQ): Questions and Answers about Cannabis on NCI\u2019s website:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">advising&#8211;not found anywhere in \u201cCannabis and Cannabinoids.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">that cannabinoids are useful in treating cancer and its side effects\u2014these words are from Question 2, What are cannabinoids, second paragraph: \u201cCannabinoids <em>may be<\/em> useful in treating the side effects of cancer and cancer treatment\u201d (emphasis added).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">by smoking, eating it in a baked product, drinking herbal teas, or even spraying it under the tongue\u2014these words and phrases are lifted from different parts of Question 5, How is cannabis administered?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">\u201cCannabis\u00a0may be taken by mouth or may be inhaled. When taken by mouth (in baked products or as an herbal\u00a0tea), the main psychoactive ingredient\u00a0in\u00a0Cannabis\u00a0(delta-9-THC) is processed by the liver, making an additional psychoactive chemical. \u00a0. . . A growing number of clinical trials\u00a0are studying a medicine\u00a0made from a whole-plant extract\u00a0of\u00a0<em>Cannabis<\/em>\u00a0that contains specific amounts of cannabinoids. This medicine is sprayed under the tongue.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">[The medicine is nabiximols, trade-name Sativex, which is 50 percent THC and 50 percent cannabidiol extracted from the marijuana plant and purified.]<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">In addition to doctoring his quotation, the author presents his claim as information NCI quietly slipped onto its website only two weeks ago. He fails to notice that the mid-July date is an update, not a brand new \u201cadmission\u201d of information \u201cpreviously concealed from the public.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">He also fails to report Questions 9 and 10 which point out that FDA has not approved cannabis or cannabinoids for cancer <em>treatment, <\/em>not approved cannabis for treating the side effects of chemotherapy, but has approved two drugs which are synthetic THC, Dronabinol and Nabilone, for relieving chemotherapy-related nausea and vomiting in patients who do not respond to standard therapy.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">But reporting that would make it hard to conclude, as the author does, that \u201cit is absolutely despicable, and frankly evil, that the medical industry helped keep an incredibly inexpensive and highly-effective cancer-killing drug out of reach.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Politicususa.com gets an \u201cA\u201d for spin, but an \u201cF\u201d for accuracy. File this story in the trash can where it belongs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Read Politicususa.com story <a href=\"http:\/\/nationalfamilies.us2.list-manage1.com\/track\/click?u=2138d91b74dd79cbf58e302bf&amp;id=a3408376b0&amp;e=cf79f39d5d\">here<\/a>.\u00a0Read National Cancer Institute Cannabis and Cannabinoids Q&amp;A <a href=\"http:\/\/nationalfamilies.us2.list-manage2.com\/track\/click?u=2138d91b74dd79cbf58e302bf&amp;id=6dcdea3feb&amp;e=cf79f39d5d\">here<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;\">Source: TheMarijuanaReport.org\u00a0 26<sup>th<\/sup> August 2015<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are at least two sides to every debate, but in the case of marijuana legalization, only proponents\u2019 side is being heard. That changes with the\u00a0publication this month of Marijuana Debunked. One of the favorite claims of marijuana-legalization proponents (and biased journalists, see next story) is that marijuana cures cancer. Like most other claims for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,90],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11294","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-effects-of-drugs","category-global-drug-legalisation-efforts"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11294","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11294"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11294\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11294"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11294"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11294"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}