{"id":7367,"date":"2011-01-24T14:53:03","date_gmt":"2011-01-24T14:53:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/?p=7367"},"modified":"2011-01-24T14:53:03","modified_gmt":"2011-01-24T14:53:03","slug":"high-potency-cannabis-and-the-risk-of-psychosis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2011\/01\/high-potency-cannabis-and-the-risk-of-psychosis\/","title":{"rendered":"High-potency cannabis and the risk of psychosis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana;\">During the last quarter of the 20th century recreational use of<br \/>\ncannabis increased greatly across the world.1 Cannabis consumption<br \/>\ncame to be seen as a normal leisure activity, and was regarded<br \/>\nas safe even by the medical establishment.2 However, in recent<br \/>\nyears there has been considerable controversy over the use of<br \/>\ncannabis, with, for example, the UK government repeatedly<br \/>\nreviewing its safety.3 This concern has arisen from large prospective<br \/>\nepidemiological studies which have reported that use of<br \/>\ncannabis increases the risk of schizophrenia-like psychosis.4,5<br \/>\nHowever, these studies have not collected detailed data on the<br \/>\npatterns of use or potency of the cannabis used, which may be<br \/>\nimportant factors moderating the associated risk.6<br \/>\nThe principal constituents of cannabis are D9-tetrahydrocannabinol<br \/>\n(D9-THC) and cannabidiol. The former is the main<br \/>\npsychoactive ingredient and in experimental studies it produces<br \/>\ntransient psychotic symptoms and impaired memory in a dose dependent<br \/>\nmanner.6,7 In contrast, cannabidiol does not induce<br \/>\nhallucinations or delusions, and it seems to antagonise the cognitive<br \/>\nimpairment and psychotogenic effects caused by D9-THC.6<br \/>\nUntil the early 2000s the most freely available type of cannabis<br \/>\nin the UK was cannabis resin (\u2018hash\u2019), which had approximately<br \/>\n70% of the \u2018street\u2019 market, followed by traditional imported herbal<br \/>\ncannabis and then sinsemilla (\u2018skunk\u2019). Cannabis resin contains<br \/>\n2\u20134% D9-THC and a similar proportion of cannabidiol, whereas<br \/>\nherbal cannabis contains a similar percentage of D9-THC but no<br \/>\ncannabidiol.8,9 However, sinsemilla (skunk) has increasingly taken<br \/>\nover the UK market and its THC concentration, and to a lesser<br \/>\nextent that of imported herbal cannabis, has been consistently<br \/>\nrising. For example, seizures of cannabis on the streets of England<br \/>\nin 2008 by the police showed that sinsemilla had a market share<br \/>\nof more than 70%, and had reached a D9-THC concentration of<br \/>\n12\u201318% with virtually no cannabidiol.8,9<\/p>\n<p>Smith has suggested that such high-potency cannabis might be<br \/>\nespecially harmful to mental health.10 We therefore compared<br \/>\npatterns and types of cannabis use in people experiencing their<br \/>\nfirst episode of psychosis and in a healthy control sample.<br \/>\nSpecifically, we sought to test the hypothesis that daily use of<br \/>\nhigh-potency cannabis is associated with a particularly high risk<br \/>\nof psychosis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Method<\/strong><br \/>\nSample<br \/>\nWe approached all patients aged 18\u201365 years who presented with a<br \/>\nfirst episode of psychosis to the Lambeth, Southwark and Croydon<br \/>\nadult in-patient units of the South London &#038; Maudsley Mental<br \/>\nHealth National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust between<br \/>\nDecember 2005 and October 2008. We validated clinical diagnosis<br \/>\nby administering the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in<br \/>\nNeuropsychiatry (SCAN).11 Patients who met ICD\u201310 criteria<br \/>\nfor a diagnosis of psychosis (codes F20\u2013F29 and F30\u2013F33)12 were<br \/>\ninvited to participate in the study; cases with a diagnosis of<br \/>\norganic psychosis were excluded. During the same period we<br \/>\nrecruited a healthy control group (n = 174) from the local<br \/>\npopulation living in the area served by the Trust, by means of<br \/>\ninternet and newspaper advertisements, and distribution of<br \/>\nleaflets at train stations, shops and job centres. Cannabis was<br \/>\nnot mentioned in these advertisements. Particular attention was<br \/>\ndirected to attempting to obtain a control sample similar to the<br \/>\npatient sample in age, gender, ethnicity, educational qualifications<br \/>\nand employment status. Those who agreed to participate were<br \/>\nadministered the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire,13 and<br \/>\nexcluded if they met criteria for a psychotic disorder or reported<br \/>\na previous diagnosis of psychotic illness.<br \/>\nEthical permission was obtained from the Trust and the<br \/>\nInstitute of Psychiatry research ethics committee. All study<br \/>\nparticipants signed a consent form allowing publication of data<br \/>\noriginating from the study.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Background<\/strong><br \/>\nPeople who use cannabis have an increased risk of<br \/>\npsychosis, an effect attributed to the active ingredient D9-<br \/>\ntetrahydrocannabinol (D9-THC). There has recently been<br \/>\nconcern over an increase in the concentration of D9-THC in<br \/>\nthe cannabis available in many countries.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Aims<br \/>\n<\/strong>To investigate whether people with a first episode of<br \/>\npsychosis were particularly likely to use high-potency<br \/>\ncannabis.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Method<\/strong><br \/>\nWe collected information on cannabis use from 280 cases<br \/>\npresenting with a first episode of psychosis to the South<br \/>\nLondon &#038; Maudsley National Health Service (NHS) Foundation<br \/>\nTrust, and from 174 healthy controls recruited from the local<br \/>\npopulation.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Results<\/strong><br \/>\nThere was no significant difference between cases and<br \/>\ncontrols in whether they had ever taken cannabis, or age at<br \/>\nfirst use. However, those in the cases group were more<br \/>\nlikely to be current daily users (OR = 6.4) and to have smoked<br \/>\ncannabis for more than 5 years (OR = 2.1). Among those who<br \/>\nused cannabis, 78% of the cases group used high-potency<br \/>\ncannabis (sinsemilla, \u2018skunk\u2019) compared with 37% of the<br \/>\ncontrol group (OR 6.8).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Conclusions<\/strong><br \/>\nThe finding that people with a first episode of psychosis had<br \/>\nsmoked higher-potency cannabis, for longer and with greater<br \/>\nfrequency, than a healthy control group is consistent with<br \/>\nthe hypothesis that D9-THC is the active ingredient<br \/>\nincreasing risk of psychosis. This has important public health<br \/>\nimplications, given the increased availability and use of highpotency<br \/>\ncannabis.<\/p>\n<p><em>Source:  The British Journal of Psychiatry (2009)<br \/>\n195, 488\u2013491. doi: 10.1192\/bjp.bp.109.064220<\/em><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>During the last quarter of the 20th century recreational use of cannabis increased greatly across the world.1 Cannabis consumption came to be seen as a normal leisure activity, and was regarded as safe even by the medical establishment.2 However, in recent years there has been considerable controversy over the use of cannabis, with, for example, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7367","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-effects-of-drugs-papers"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7367","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7367"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7367\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7367"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7367"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7367"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}