{"id":9681,"date":"2014-08-23T17:08:13","date_gmt":"2014-08-23T17:08:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/?p=9681"},"modified":"2016-09-20T20:38:31","modified_gmt":"2016-09-20T20:38:31","slug":"colorado-lawmaker-seeks-marijuana-tax-review-amid-disappointing-sales","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2014\/08\/colorado-lawmaker-seeks-marijuana-tax-review-amid-disappointing-sales\/","title":{"rendered":"Colorado lawmaker seeks marijuana tax review amid disappointing sales"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Colorado&#8217;s tax collections from recreational marijuana sales in the past fiscal year came in more than 60 percent below early predictions, and now a state lawmaker says it may be time to reconsider the tax formula.<br \/>\nState Rep. Dan Pabon, who is leading a special legislative committee on marijuana revenue, said the medical-marijuana system also may come under scrutiny.<br \/>\n&#8220;There&#8217;s some real impact that the medical marijuana market is having on the recreational marijuana market,&#8221; said Pabon, D-Denver. &#8220;I think it&#8217;s worth looking at the taxation on the recreational side but also looking at the rules and regulations on the medical side.&#8221;\u00a0Tuesday marked the first meeting of the committee, which is studying how Colorado spends its marijuana tax money.<\/p>\n<p>The first item of business: Why is there so much less of it than predicted?<\/p>\n<p>When Colorado voters approved special taxes on recreational marijuana in November,\u202fthe official fiscal analysis\u202festimated the taxes would bring in a combined $33.5 million through that fiscal year, which ended this summer. Budgeters for Gov. John Hickenlooper had\u202fsimilarly optimistic projections. \u00a0But the actual number came in at\u202fjust more than $12 million. \u00a0A market study\u202ffor the Colorado Department of Revenue says the lower-taxed medical-marijuana market, which continues to outpace the recreational market in sales,\u202fis to blame. \u00a0Rather than pulling consumers out of the medical-marijuana market, the recreational market largely has feasted on tourists and people who previously bought pot on the black market. \u00a0&#8220;I think our original assumption about the cannibalization was wrong,&#8221; Colorado Legislative Council economist Larson Silbaugh said at Tuesday&#8217;s committee meeting. \u00a0The result, suggested David Blake of the Colorado attorney general&#8217;s office, is that the resilience of the medical-marijuana market &#8220;is being driven by avoidance of that tax.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dorinda Floyd, the chief financial officer for the Department of Revenue, said recreational sales continue to rise and eventually are expected to surpass medical sales &#8220;in the out years.&#8221;\u00a0Meanwhile, state economists have adjusted their predictions. A forecast in June\u202fsignificantly\u202fdialed back expectations\u202ffor the current fiscal year \u2014 $30.6 million in special recreational marijuana taxes, compared with\u202fthe roughly $100 million\u202fthat Hickenlooper&#8217;s office had predicted this year.\u00a0A new forecast is due in September. \u00a0&#8220;While I think our forecasts are getting better,&#8221; Silbaugh said, &#8220;they&#8217;re still based on just six months of data.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Source: denverpost.com 12th August 2014<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Colorado&#8217;s tax collections from recreational marijuana sales in the past fiscal year came in more than 60 percent below early predictions, and now a state lawmaker says it may be time to reconsider the tax formula. State Rep. Dan Pabon, who is leading a special legislative committee on marijuana revenue, said the medical-marijuana system also [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,82,90,14,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-drug-specifics","category-economic","category-global-drug-legalisation-efforts","category-social-affairs","category-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}