{"id":9723,"date":"2016-08-23T11:45:20","date_gmt":"2016-08-23T11:45:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/?p=9723"},"modified":"2016-09-20T07:56:28","modified_gmt":"2016-09-20T07:56:28","slug":"legalizing-marijuana-in-oregon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/2016\/08\/legalizing-marijuana-in-oregon\/","title":{"rendered":"Legalizing Marijuana in Oregon"},"content":{"rendered":"

I continue to be puzzled by an attitude that if something is difficult to enforce then we should abandon attempts and just legalize it. That is apparently the attitude of Oregon\u2019s politicians (Republican and Democrat alike) and is reflected in the comments of the official spokesman for the government elites \u2013 The Oregonian \u2013 in its August 23 edition:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOregon has had a wink-wink, nudge-nudge relationship with recreational marijuana use since 1998, when legalization for medical purposes created a wide, open system that distributes pot cards to just about anyone with a vague medical claim and the signature of a compliant physician. We\u2019re not suggesting that marijuana has no palliative value to those with genuine medical problems. But let\u2019s be honest: Recreational marijuana is all but legal in Oregon now and has been for years. Measure 91, which deserves Oregonians\u2019 support, would eliminate the charade and give adults freer access to an intoxicant that should not have been prohibited in the first place.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

There it is. The marijuana advocates foisted a canard on Oregonians by exploiting the plight of those benefiting from the use of medical marijuana. Having convinced Oregonians that those is need should not be denied, they set up a system that guaranteed abuses and then urged others to look the other way when the abuses became obvious and widespread. Wink, wink, nod, nod. There\u2019s a solid foundation for change. (For those of you forced to endure a teachers union led education in Portland public schools, that is what is meant by \u201csarcasm\u201d.)<\/span><\/p>\n

And now the second canard is upon us with the assertion that \u201ceveryone is already doing it\u201d and that recreational marijuana is not harmful. When the push began, those supporting it chanted \u201cnobody has ever died from marijuana.\u201d And that folks, is just plain bulls\u2014t.<\/span><\/p>\n

A New York Times article on May 31, 2014, noted:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cFive months after Colorado became the first state to allow recreational marijuana sales, the battle over legalization is still raging.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLaw enforcement officers in Colorado and neighboring states, emergency room doctors and legalization opponents increasingly are highlighting a series of recent problems as cautionary lessons for other states flirting with loosening marijuana laws.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere is the Denver man who, hours after buying a package of marijuana-infused Karma Kandy from one of Colorado\u2019s new recreational marijuana shops, began raving about the end of the world and then pulled a handgun from the family safe and killed his wife, the authorities say. Some hospital officials say they are treating growing numbers of children and adults sickened by potent doses of edible marijuana. Sheriffs in neighboring states complain about stoned drivers streaming out of Colorado and through their towns.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

On May 24, 2014, Newsweek reported:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cWednesday\u2019s move in Colorado to tighten rules on edible goods made with pot comes after two adult deaths possibly linked to such products. Meanwhile, a Colorado children\u2019s hospital said it has seen an uptick in the number of admissions of children who ingested marijuana-laced foods since the start of the year.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201c\u2019Since the \u2026 legalization of recreational marijuana sales, Children\u2019s Colorado has treated nine children, six of whom became critically ill from edible marijuana,\u2019 the statement from Colorado Children\u2019s Hospital said.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

And The Raw Story reported on April 2, 2014:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cA Wyoming college student visiting Colorado on spring break is the first reported death related to the legal sale of recreational marijuana.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cLevy Thamba, a student at Northwest College, fell to his death last month from the balcony of a Holiday Inn in Denver.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAutopsy results released Monday showed the 19-year-old Thamba, who was also known as Levi Thamba Pongi, died from multiple injuries caused by the fall. But the coroner also listed \u2018marijuana intoxication\u2019 from a pot-infused cookie as a significant contributor to the student\u2019s death.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

And finally, CBS reported from Seattle on February 4, 2014:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAccording to a recent study, fatal car crashes involving pot use have tripled in the U.S.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2018Currently, one of nine drivers involved in fatal crashes would test positive for marijuana,\u2019 Dr. Guohua Li, director of the Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention at Columbia, and co-author of the study told HealthDay News.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

But the Oregonian is undeterred by the mounting evidence of harm:<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cOpponents of the measure are right about a couple of things. Allowing retail sales of recreational marijuana inevitably will make it easier for kids to get their hands on the stuff, as will Measure 91\u2032s provision allowing Oregonians to grow their own. It\u2019s also true that outright legalization will increase the number of people driving under the influence, which is particularly problematic given the absence of a simple and reliable test for intoxication. There is no bong Breathalyzer.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cAs real as these consequences are, Oregonians should support outright legalization. . .\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

We have imposed safety requirements on a whole host of things including guns, automobiles, golf carts, children\u2019s toys and food products that have a lower incident rate of death and injury than is being currently compiled by the unrestricted use of marijuana. Oregon is now tying itself in knots trying to eliminate the use of genetically modified organisms (GMO) with no scientific evidence of harm and only a speculation as to what might become. But there is no apparent concern about the modification of marijuana to increase its potency which has resulted in numerous adverse health issues with children and adults alike.<\/span><\/p>\n

And while the Oregonian acknowledges that there is no \u201csimple and reliable test for marijuana intoxication\u201d it fails to note that there is similarly no simple and reliable test for testing potency. There are no labeling requirements and no guidelines as to the limits of consumption and impairment. Contrast that with the liquor industry that has defined limits and labeling on the alcohol content of various beers, wine and liquors. There are exacting studies that demonstrate the effects of alcohol on a person given weight variations.<\/span><\/p>\n

And yet the Oregonian ignores that in favor of addressing it sometime in the future \u2013 maybe.<\/span><\/p>\n

And Oregon\u2019s politicians are even less helpful because they are fixated on tax revenue opportunities from the unrestricted use of marijuana. Little thought is<\/span><\/p>\n

being given to the problems that will be caused. Their sole focus is upon using regression analysis to determine how high the tax can be without seriously reducing the volume of consumption \u2013 it is the same myopic view used when determining the tax on tobacco. That amount of tax will increase over time as the use becomes more widespread and the dependency becomes more pronounced and as state government becomes more dependent on the revenue generated, the ability to correct the abuses of marijuana will be marginalized \u2013 just like tobacco.<\/span><\/p>\n

In the end, this is all about the \u201cme generation\u201d and that pervasive attitude that \u201cif it feels good, do it.\u201d It furthers the myth of life without consequences. The only upside is for those who eschew getting high in favor of getting hired \u2013 your prospects for getting a good job and routine promotion are greatly enhanced.<\/span><\/p>\n

Source: www.oregoncatalyst.com<\/a> 27th August 2014<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I continue to be puzzled by an attitude that if something is difficult to enforce then we should abandon attempts and just legalize it. That is apparently the attitude of Oregon\u2019s politicians (Republican and Democrat alike) and is reflected in the comments of the official spokesman for the government elites \u2013 The Oregonian \u2013 in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,90,12,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-effects-of-drugs","category-global-drug-legalisation-efforts","category-legal-sector","category-usa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/drugprevent.org.uk\/ppp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}